Many people think that doing the same thing over and over again is a good plan for the employees' day. They say that this makes their day move smoother and less hectic. Although I understand their opinion, I have a different point of view. I believe that doing different tasks is more exciting, and more challenging.
First, doing the same task all day long is so boring. It gives the feeling of routine and after time people will give up on doing this task. For example, I can't imagine my self doing laundry all day long at home, or just dispensing prescriptions only through my eight hours shift at the pharmacy. Moving from dispensing prescriptions to do some register stuff to check inventory coming back to dispensing prescriptions, is much more exciting. This makes the time flies faster and gives the feeling of moving. This in return gives the feeling that a task is done and we need to proceed to the next task. The feeling of task accomplishment cheers the employee and satisfy his/her soul, which increase their potentiality to work harder and do even tougher tasks.
Second, although doing the same task over and over leads to perfection and professionality in doing this task, it kills the challenging spirit inside the employee. Being in the comfort zone kills ambitiousness, and I believe companies don't want lazy, routinely employee who comes work to just do his/her work to only get paid and that set. Companies grow with those employees how are ready to face different stages of challenges. employees who can fight for their future and their companies' future. And to assure that, employees should not be in their comfort zones doing the same job or task forever, they have to rotate tasks, face hurdles and do their best to go over them.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I encourage governments, companies, and small business owners to challenges their employees with different tasks every now and then, also to rotate task and jobs between employees so they don't get bored. If you did so, you will discover for yourself, how much those employees will be happy and willing to work more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...r and over again is a good plan for the employees day. They say that this makes their day...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e up on doing this task. For example, I cant imagine my self doing laundry all day l...
^^^^
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... ambitiousness, and I believe companies dont want lazy, routinely employee who comes...
^^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Employees
...to face different stages of challenges. employees who can fight for their future and thei...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...es their employees with different tasks every now and then, also to rotate task and jobs between e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...task and jobs between employees so they dont get bored. If you did so, you will disc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83791208791 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58411652087 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53021978022 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2761246639 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260468238522 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899943479757 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753241093069 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163175832109 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537544453787 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.