Working three days a week for long hours or five days a week for shorter hours which one is better?
It has long been a controversy among my extended family that of the two options of working three days a week for long hours or five days a week for shorter hours which one is more preferable. As far as I am concerned, answering to this question is imperative as it deals with one of the most important methods for living efficiently. I would agree that working only three days a week for long hours is better compared to the other way.
The first reason I should mention is that working three days a week would give us more time and comfort in weekends. I remember, when I was a kid, my father had a temporary job for a company for only three days a week; Those days are among the best days of my life as he spent so much time with me, such as traveling to nearby cities, watching sports and etc. After the completion of his mission in the company, he did not have enough time for time-consumption hobbies.
The second reason for my propensity is that it is much better if we have to work another job to support our family. According to a research, conducted by one of the most reputable universities in my country, people have two jobs on average due to low salaries. In this scenario, the residents of my country would love to work in a job with lower days as they can do another job. On the contrary, some people may argue that they can do their second job in afternoon. However, part jobs or non-primarily jobs are usually are in work time and by doing so they would miss their chance.
The last, but not the least, most people that I know including myself would like to get rid of their tasks in a job immediately compared to doing the task or project every day. A prime example from my own experience may shed some light to this point; during the days of my job as a teaching assistant in a university, I noticed, it is more enjoyable to work hard to finish my project compared to only working in the so-called working hours. By doing that, I was able to save my time for more important things in my life such as enjoying a trip with my family to another country.
To conclude, considering the above reasons, it is more efficient and enjoyable to work harder in some certain days. Just as the English proverb goes "a coin has two sides" those who take the opposite view are partially reasonable.
- In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 80
- tpo29 80
- TPO 33Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 80
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called 80
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: AND_ETC
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
...eling to nearby cities, watching sports and etc. After the completion of his mission in ...
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
... jobs or non-primarily jobs are usually are in work time and by doing so they would...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37819025522 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52168634648 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480278422274 0.524837075471 92% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6832876868 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9375 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9375 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389615337693 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140779078252 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192049433459 0.0737576698707 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236019365143 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.249748615728 0.0645574589148 387% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.