Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before? Why?
From a general standpoint, the quality of education directly contributes to people's future job prosperity. The elements associating to a thriving education which lead to strengthen our abilities is a controversial subject which often provokes many discussions. Some people keep endorsing the fact that having classes with professor whom we do not know is better whereas others dismiss this idea. Personally, it is my firm conviction that choosing professors whom we have previously classes seems more impressive. In what follows, I aptly elucidate on what rationale my perspective is based on.
To commerce, the previously known professors' method of teaching and line of though is obvious to us clearly. To put in a vivid picture, it is a norm that all teachers and mentors provides a framework comprise of specific material, books, way of taking exams and so on through whole span of their career. Moreover, each of the professors posses a special line of thought which often differs from one to another and is typical of that person driving from his believes and attitude. Having passed class with one of the professors, provides us having acquaintance to his working criteria and academic objectives which eases getting a long with them. Referring to my own experience as a compelling example, I always used to choose familiar professors during freshman. Thus, I was completely aware of what my professor expect us to accomplish at the end of the term and wrote my paper on the topic of which he was in favor. Had I preferred a known professor I was aware of how the class be going and did not have problem getting acquaintance with his procedure and expectations.
The second pivotal reason that bears in mind is that students can communicate with familiar professors better that aliens and vice a versa. In other words, when we have met the professor in the past we have an imagination of that person and this cognition relieves our anxiety of communication. Therefore, we can ask him our questions and propose our ideas more easily which gives rise the development of our knowledge and drives our productivity. According to my aforementioned example, as I have insight into my professor's positive reaction toward asking irrelevant questions and arising new topics, I feel convenient proposing whatever has occupied my mind to obtain the answer. If I was not familiar with his manner, I would have not never dare to propose different subjects and could not foster my creativity and squinch my thirst of learning.
To put it in a nutshell, I prefer to have classes with familiar professors. This is because not only I will not have problem getting familiar with their mindset and training techniques, but also do it attributes to more adequate and productive communication between us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...ty of education directly contributes to peoples future job prosperity. The elements ass...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...achers and mentors provides a framework comprise of specific material, books, way of taking...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...drives our productivity. According to my aforementioned example, as I have insigh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, i feel, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03023758099 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93921933592 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544276457883 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7760813845 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.578947368 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3684210526 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22586508622 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762000903189 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068303705526 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142290270785 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180413595232 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.