Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before? Why?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
In today's chaotic life, education plays a vital role, which determines the prosperity and retardance of society. In this regard, teachers and professors are the wings of education to achieve its final goal of building a prosperous community. In this line of thought, some students believe that choosing the same professor whom they got to know in their previous courses is more advantageous than selecting new professors, while the other group holds the opposite view. I, personally, concur with the former group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First, selecting a familiar teacher improves mental health. To be more specific, students experience a plethora of stress and pressure during their educational life. These stresses mostly are around behaving properly in classes to attract teachers' attention. If students have enough time to realize the factors that positively impact their professors, they can improve their performance, which brings a sense of satisfaction. Besides, when educators get to know their students and their weaknesses, they can help them to eliminate them, which in turn decreases their stress levels. Emerging happy feelings and removing detrimental stress and negative emotions, both, improve psychic health. Therefore, better mental health and intellectual ability can get attained by selecting the same teacher for several semesters.
Secondly, bonds between students and professors would strengthen by choosing the known professor, leading to increasing students' efficiency. Indeed, when people spend a sum of time together, they would create strong relationships and connections, so as to assist each other reach goals in their lives. The teacher-student relationship is not an exception. If a professor knows students for an elongated period, he/she would be encouraged to help them through their path to earn glory and success, which are the main purposes of education. I take myself as an example to elucidate this issue. When I was at Tehran University, I chose Professor Ghourchian 3 semesters in a row for different courses. During this period, we matched up strongly. He became aware of my passion for fabricating biosensors so he began to work on my knowledge and laboratory experience in this era, ignoring the title of the course I had participated in. The achievement of this relation for me was that I learned almost everything about biosensors, both theoretically and practically. Actually, I gained more information in this subject than anybody could achieve during exclusively the Sensor Fundamentals course. Moreover, I became qualified enough to take a great job at a biosensor fabricating company owing to working with the same educator for a long time.
To wrap up, having the same professor in the educational career is beneficial. Not only does it enhance mental health but it also makes bonds between students and educators so sturdy to increase their output and productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oal of building a prosperous community. In this line of thought, some students bel...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... known professor, leading to increasing students efficiency. Indeed, when people spend a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e strong relationships and connections, so as to assist each other reach goals in their ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2516.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41075268817 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97913195309 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584946236559 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8918260006 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.833333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103441761044 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297403362457 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279868918515 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062137383147 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370749322979 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.