It is obvious that when you are trying to choose a leader for a group, you should select person who has several important traits. Leader of a group plays a vital role in a group and a good leader helps a team to achieve its goals easier and faster. Although there are a lot of good traits which a leader can have, I strongly believe that the most important characteristic for a leader is being honest. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
I think leader of a group should have characteristics such as taking responsibility, being intelligent, being diligent, and so on. Nevertheless, the most prominent trait of a leader is to be honest. If a group has a sincere leader, other members of the team can trust him or her. As a result, it encourages all members to work and try harder in order to achieve their objectives, and this group will be more successful. For example, when I was a student at high school, I took part in a group activity. But unfortunately although our leader was a clever person, he was a dishonest person. Hence, he was not a reliable one and members did not rely on him anymore, and we were forced to choose another person as a leader.
Moreover, I believe that when a leader of a team has not sincerity and honesty, it causes members of group do not obey him or her and are not responsible for their duties. Thus, this group cannot meet its aims and it makes damage to whole of group. For instance, my friend had participated in a student group, his leader lied to them in favor of herself. Consequently, members did not respect her and pay attention her. They did not carry out their tasks properly and thus our team could not gain satisfactory results.
To sum up, it is essential that a group’s leader has suitable characteristics in order to help the group fulfill its aims. In my point of view, being honest is the most important trait of a leader because without having sincerity, members of team cannot trust him or her and do not cooperate with each other to achieve their goals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with each other to achieve their goals.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53866666667 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7314217706 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498666666667 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6270276514 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184653442806 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665347256446 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618592874833 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131443801826 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702804860856 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.