You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would you choose? Why?
-- A professor who proves to be very popular in students’ evaluations
-- A professor who was recently given an award for outstanding research.
When I am faced of the dilemma that which professor should I choose, better say I have to make a decision between two conditions. One is I will choose a nice professor, the other is I will choose a professor with strong academic ability. And my answer goes to the former. The reasons are as follows.
First of all, the reasons why a professor can be accepted by so many students are of many situations. It can due to his great teaching style. For example, the professor may be humorous when showing an abstruse and abstract theory or the professor can explain profound theories in simple words. And it can also because of the good grades after you take his lessons. Thus, the professor must have some advantages and superiority over other teachers so he can attract so many students to give him good comments and no matter what kind of situation, the outcome won’t frustrate myself.
Second, a professor which can own such a good reputation must spare enough time to communicate with his students no matter in class or out of the class. However, when comes to a professor who was immersed in his research and paper, we may not get enough instructions from him . That is to say, he may not have enough time to focus on his students. As one popular saying among us students, a teacher who can carry out great papers may not be a teacher who can teach good students. Thus, in terms that the time of a professor is limited, I would like to choose one professor who really cares about his students.
So here’s the answer. The professor with a good academic background may not be a nice teacher in students’ evaluations. But a nice professor must have one or more unique thing which can appeal to so many students. Thus, I would choose the professor who proves to be very popular in students’ evaluations.
- TPO44-W1 76
- 6.Most adults believe that modern children (5-10 years old) behave worse than those in the past. What action parents should take do you think will have the most positive effect on children to help them behave better like respecting and treating others kin 73
- TPO30-W1 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decisions quickly. When a leader takes too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as inefficient to the people he leads. 76
- 14. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Universities should require every graduation students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...may not get enough instructions from him . That is to say, he may not have enough ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, really, second, so, thus, for example, kind of, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64197530864 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69847381806 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5361509093 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5555555556 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240057397415 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757909999961 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528996968468 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151864355441 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245513032063 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.