????????????????????

Essay topics:

????????????????????

Actually, both the passage and the lecture comment about the possibility of maintaining on Venus. Although the article brings three conspicuous pieces of evidence for proving the issue that being alive on the Venus surface is impossible, the professor puts all the reasons under the question. According to the lecturer, none of those factors are convincing.

First, as the passage mentioned, the atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is so high that human immediately be crushed as well as other spacecraft which have traveled to Venus; nonetheless, the speaker refutes the statement by expressing the fact that in high part of planet pressure is tolerable for people. in other words, the higher the elevation, the less pressure that has to be stood by body of creatures; therefore, people can be present there.

Next, as the article declared, water and oxygen resources in Venus haven't been detected; moreover, human life extremely depends on these sources; hence, humans’ presence doesn't seem logical and rational. the lecturer; however, doesn't validate the claim by emphasizing the idea that other components in the air can be converted to water and oxygen easily; thus, the problem can be solved by generating them.

Finally, the passage introduces the lack of light as a vital issue by statistical scrutinizing of the condition of the clouds in Venus. The passage dismisses the indicated claim by adding some solutions. He believes; albeit, sunlight is low because of blocking of the clouds, the reflection of this sunlight can be used as an alternative.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...none of those factors are convincing. First, as the passage mentioned, the atm...
^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...lanet pressure is tolerable for people. in other words, the higher the elevation, ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erefore, people can be present there. Next, as the article declared, water and...
^^^^
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ed, water and oxygen resources in Venus havent been detected; moreover, human life ext...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e sources; hence, humans' presence doesnt seem logical and rational. the lecturer...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...sence doesnt seem logical and rational. the lecturer; however, doesnt validate the ...
^^^
Line 9, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...al and rational. the lecturer; however, doesnt validate the claim by emphasizing the i...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lem can be solved by generating them. Finally, the passage introduces the lack...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29482071713 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82384974721 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1713425474 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.9 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9 7.06452816374 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.