The text and the lecture both talked about the allegations of segrigation in a movie called Gone with the Wind. The movie was reputed as the important for the hitory of slaves in America, but there has been critical opinions to this movie. In the lecture, the professor refutes the main idea made in the reading, so the following passages show the details about her opinion.
Today, scholars states that the movie is the most seen as romance and feminist about a Southern family during the American Civil War. Main character, Scarlett O'hara, is a slave owner whose privillege to own American Africans. The professer says that this is overstated because Southern people were not refered as wise. Before the war, they had limited opportunities; as being mother and wife, and after the war they became rich and more complex so they were protected. Thus, the reading passage reputed Southern people too much as well-off.
Second, Butterfly McQueen who acts a servant was criticized by the civil rights specialist Malcom X because his acting in the film made reputator embarassed. The speaker admires the acotor because he showed disobeying attitude to his owner with high pitched voice, therefore he should be appreciated as a black actor instead of blamed as a racism. Hence, the critics about actor is wrong, and they actually paved the way to African American actors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed the way to African American actors.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01310043668 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49422589807 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64192139738 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7343426707 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.363636364 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107108021232 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397088316693 0.0996497079465 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035426567135 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705770793926 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242576212587 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.