The professor and the author both talk about benefits of autonomous car. According to the speaker, she refutes the main idea made in the reading passage. The following three points support her opinion.
First, the lecturer states that car accident would not be prevented because even the sensors detect cars and other disabilities in their way, there is possibility that advanced technology cars fail at some points. By the author, the accident on highways will decrease because of contribute to the accurate sensors such as brakes.
Second, the professor claims that smart cars are not helping us to live easily. In the reading passage, the computer controlled cars could take care of themselves even at high speeds thus the author says it would be less traffic and increase population of commuter by car. However, the speaker does not think so because if there are many people use a car to commute, additional cars are everywhere and traffic jam could be worse.
Lastly, about reducing expenses for repairing and replace cars. In contrast, traditional cars does not cost a lot to fix it when it is broken but the parts of autonomous cars are really expensive. The lecturer casts doubt on the high technology cars are not reasonable because they calculate informations to drive such as how far they need to stay behind the car. Therefore, she tells that it is not better way to save money.
In conclusion, the speaker shows her opinion that she disagrees with the author.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, really, second, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96385542169 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54319310396 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4961537053 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0769230769 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228647545341 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679485788963 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605341052515 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108823387818 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605439628357 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.