The reading passage and lecture talks about the film, Gone with the Wind, of Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel. The reading passage states that the movie's reputation has fallen in recent years because of the allegations of racism portrayed in the movie. However, the lecturer disagrees and gives counter reasons for the critics.
On the first hand, the lecturer feels that it is overstated about the slavery. The reading passage states that the main character Scarlett's maid, Mammy presented in movie without a first name and gets slap on face from Scarlett. And the character was dim-witted and depicts the negative stereotypes. However, the lecturer posits that Mammy character is a rich, complex character and fierceful when comes protecting her loved ones. In addition, she portrays the character as a bold one, speaks what she thinks.
Second, the reading passage states about the civil right activist Malcolm X's critic about Butterfly McQueen’s performance and he was so embarrassed to see that. On the other hand, the lecturer disagrees with that comment by explaining about the highlights of Butterfly McQueen’s character. She goes on that the character added rebellism and was unafraid to disobey their owners in order to speak the character's mind. In addition, she says that the character uses high pitch in volume at scenes to emphasize its value.
Third, the reading passage also states that the main character Scarlett O’Hara's, a slave owner, family goes to the Civil war to keep up own rights and to degrade African Americans. But, the lecturer explains about the opportunities african americans got after the movie in industry, which paved path for future generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'movies'' or 'movie's'?
Suggestion: movies'; movie's
...el. The reading passage states that the movies reputation has fallen in recent years b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, third, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32967032967 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7507669831 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7967861523 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.928571429 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0924100509102 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373687634614 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853630262972 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709282508186 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750705203284 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.