The modern society is replete with smiling and gregarious people ubiquitously. If we take a close look on the society and its people, we can get confused with one question. Is the society’s overall look really represents reality and people’s true image? The answer is unfortunately no. People create appealing image in the society and it has become more important than representing the reality or truth behind that image.
We can see this pattern a lot in the real world in variety of people. For example, lets consider politicians. All we see in a politician’s rallys or meetings is their smiling face and the policies they rife as their goal for the nation. The question is about the uprightness of the gesture they make in public. If we watch closer, we can see a huge difference in their real personality and the public personality. Just because they talk about the nation’s growth and their goals to achieve it, doesn’t mean that they want it personally. Politics is like any other jobs, politicians do their job by this kind of appealing image. Because this image is most important in the present society to attract people than the reality behind that image.
Another great example for the dual, we can consider the celebrities life. People are so interested in the celebrities lifestyle, their outfits, their relationship status and their ups and downs. People judge them based on these things. Since these things affects their career as a famous actor/actress/writer/journalist/photographer, celebrities tend to create and maintain an appealing image in the society rather than potraying their real image.
Not only the famous people need to do this but also the common people. In day-to-day life, a commoner also needs to create an appealing image than the reality. The workplace, the friends-zone and social gatherings expects a commoner to portray himself/herself with charm and gregarious manner. This kind of expectation has been unfortunately developed among the people. People may end up being artificial all the time at social gathering and may loose theirselves in the process.
Having set of decorums about presenting oneself in public is a good principle. Even though, it becomes more alarming when the expectations crossing a bar. Considering a person’s appealing image and not paying enough attention to the reality behind that image is not good for the society in long-term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 644, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ir job by this kind of appealing image. Because this image is most important in the pre...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'celebrities'' or 'celebrity's'?
Suggestion: celebrities'; celebrity's
...ample for the dual, we can consider the celebrities life. People are so interested in the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'celebrities'' or 'celebrity's'?
Suggestion: celebrities'; celebrity's
...s life. People are so interested in the celebrities lifestyle, their outfits, their relatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 447, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ll the time at social gathering and may loose theirselves in the process. Having...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, really, so, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26342710997 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5508135724 2.79657885939 127% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6625607015 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.32 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.64 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.32 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190333170006 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552984233494 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821943416056 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115070084481 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597838766604 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.