Earth is a beautiful planet replete with plethora of plant species, land animals, water animals, birds and humans. This planet doesn’t only belong to human beings, also to other living organisms. Life on planet is a deep topic which includes the lifecycle of every creature and its impact on earth, we are taught about food chain, in school science itself, to understand them. In my opinion, earth is not a place only for humans and other species’ lives are no lesser than human life. Therefore, saving endangered animals and plant species is important for the society.
To begin with, we, humans, think that our mankind is the most important one in the planet and the awareness about maintaining diversity in other species is less among the common people. Since we are unaware of the consequences after a species extinction, we think that spending money or effort to save the endangered species is less worthy. We can think of the china grain production crisis, happened a half century ago, after china eradicated sparrows in the entire country, because they thought sparrows made loss in their production by eating grains in the field whereas, in reality, sparrows were protecting their grains from the insects, by eating them, which was damaging the crop field. Such that, we can draw the chain reactions associated with animals and plants.
In fact, if we take a closer look towards the species endangerment cases, directly or indirectly, human activities plays a role. Lets consider the global warming problem, earth’s temperature has increased significantly in the last two decades, causing various life problems to every species. Coral life has been destroyed in half of the ocean worldwide which caused a great threat to ocean lives, Polar bears are in the margin of endangered animals list, desert lives are harder for animals ever before than. These implications are the result of human’s careless resource utilization, apathy in environmental maintenance. Nonetheless, we have very little cognizant towards the planet’s environmental changes and these topics are still esoteric for comman people. Though it may be sometimes burden in moneywise we should protect these species.
The impacts that we made in earth is so huge while comparing the other species. With sixth sense, we should be the one’s that saving other species on the earth, not the cause detrimental earth environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...irectly, human activities plays a role. Lets consider the global warming problem, ea...
^^^^
Line 7, column 779, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s are still esoteric for comman people. Though it may be sometimes burden in moneywise...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27763496144 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73419390516 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591259640103 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3937609109 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.764705882 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8823529412 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125428683537 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452537049801 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452489253646 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769134051594 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219301972793 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.