The passage and the listening are discussing about the ability of European silver coin to be a historical evidence. The reading thinks that the coin from European Norse is fake. The reading believes that the coin is sufficient to have historical meaning and a genuine one.
To begin with, the author of the reading suggests the distance between the settle of Norse in North America is far from the documenting place; two places are far from each other. However, the listening opposes on what the reading believes. The tutor claims that the distance is not the problem since the Norse were able to approach to the place were they found the coin. Furthermore, these people brought the coin from the Europe.
Secondly, the text treats the fact that there is no more coins except one coin that had found. According to the passage, if the coin is really from Europe, there is no reason not to be found. Differently with the reading, she remarks that because the vikings needed to go back to their place, they brought their valuable things including their coins. Moreover, as much as they used the coins in real, there is no reason not to pack up the coins.
Finally, the writer of the article brings the question that how they used the coin in North America? Thus, the coin is not genuine. But, as following the listening, the Americans were interested in unusual objects. In addition, coins were able to use for trades as odd products not as the money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t the coin from European Norse is fake. The reading believes that the coin is suffi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72549019608 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31984567756 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521568627451 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2429859168 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3333333333 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210042062971 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810589535732 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507357299765 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132864338699 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426931124363 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.