In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to North America by European explorers known as the Norse, who traveled across the Atlantic Ocean and came into contact with Native Americans almost a thousand years ago.
However, some archaeologists believe that the coin is not a genuine piece of historical evidence but a historical fake; they think that the coin was placed at the site recently by someone who wanted to mislead the public. There are three main reasons why some archaeologists believe that the coin is not genuine historical evidence.
Great Distance from Norse Settlements
First, the Native American site in Maine where the coin was discovered is located very far from other sites documenting a Norse presence in North America. Remains of Norse settlements have been discovered in far eastern Canada. The distance between the Maine site and the Norse settlements in Canada is more than a thousand kilometers, suggesting the coin has no real connection with the settlements.
No Other Coins Found
A second problem is that no other coins have been found at the Canadian sites that were inhabited by the Norse. This suggests that the Norse did not bring any silver coins with them to their North American settlements.
No Use for European Coins
Third, the Norse who traveled to North America would have understood that silver coins would most likely be useless to them. Sitver coins may have been in wide use in Europe at the time, but the Norse, as experienced explorers, would have known that native North Americans did not recognize silver coins as money.
The reading and lecture are both about the authenticity of European silver coin discovered at Native American archaeological site. While the reading states that coin is not genuine piece of historical evidence, the lecturer clearly argues that those silver coin are actually bought to north america by European explorers known as the Norse, thus the coin is authentic historical evidence.These are the three points to support.
Firstly, the author points out that there is a great distance between Norse Settlement and the Native American site where the coin was discovered . This point is challenged by the lecturer. She suggests that many more archaeological objects have come from this site which means that Native Americans have probably traveled such long places to get things from distance
Secondly, the author posits that as no other coin was found in the location is another evidence to prove that the coin is a fake evidence. The lecturer, on the other hand , says that Norse was not a permanent settlers. She elaborated on this by mentioning that they might have packed all the silver coin back to Europe when they returned which can be a reason why no more coins found on the site.
Thirdly, the author contends that Norse had no use of silver coins in North America as they did not value coin as money..The lecturer rebuts this argument. She argues that as North Americans do value attractive things like silver. She puts forth the idea that they might have used it in necklaces and also for trading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...e coin is authentic historical evidence.These are the three points to support. Fir...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, the author points out that there is a great distance between Norse Settlement ...
^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rican site where the coin was discovered . This point is challenged by the lecture...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...robably traveled such long places to get things from distance Secondly, the au...
^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...vidence. The lecturer, on the other hand , says that Norse was not a permanent set...
^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'settler'?
Suggestion: settler
...d , says that Norse was not a permanent settlers. She elaborated on this by mentioning t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... why no more coins found on the site. Thirdly, the author contends that Norse ...
^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...rica as they did not value coin as money..The lecturer rebuts this argument. She a...
^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ca as they did not value coin as money..The lecturer rebuts this argument. She argu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96470588235 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52709881211 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545098039216 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.1739190464 49.2860985944 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325281289781 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128988908818 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102685778402 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194118554267 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801276959145 0.0443174109184 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.