4-day working
The lecture talks about the disadvantages in 4-day working and, in doing so, contradicts much of the information that is related in the reading. Specifically, the writing contradicts the reading on three major points: company profits, new employments and quality of life.
The reading passage asserts that 4-day working will increase company profits as the work efficiency increases. However, the lecture contradicts the writer’s argument by saying due to the need of more employment, as the company expenditure increases the profit will decrease. Although in 4-day working system employees are paid less, the cost to train employees and provide medical service remains the same. Therefore, the company expenditure rises in a 4-day working system which ultimately drops company profit.
Also, the reading passage contends that 4-day working will create new jobs as employees are needed to fill vacancy. In contrast, the lecture argues that employment will decrease. Employment costs a lot of money as stated before, and employer swill find other options such as increasing working hours or forcing night shift instead.
Lastly, the reading passages claims that fewer working hours will increase the quality of life of employees since it will ensure more free time to spend. On the other hand, the lecture doubts this assertion. Instead of having more free time, it could decrease the quality of life since 4-day workers have disadvantage in getting a promotion or finding a lucrative career.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67577340476 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.420097873 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361983414375 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15050257872 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143555095548 0.0662205650399 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228576846427 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888957214363 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.