Is it better to work on a project in a group or to work by yourself? Give reasons or examples from your life, events, etc.
In university classess, workplaces and clubs, you will meet a situation when you have to work on a project in a group through cooperation with your teammates. However, some people do not prefer working with others like a lone tiger. These type of people believe that working on a team may decrease the efficiency of the work as people make useless arguments and also there are team members that to not actively participate in the project. In contrast to this idea, I prefer working in a group with others because firstly, I could explore and accept many ideas suggested by others and find a better solution by assessing those ideas. Also, forming a team for a project gives me the opportunity to meet new friends and mates.
To begin with, in a group, I will have the chance to listen to other people's variable ideas, and also critically assessing those creative ideas, I will be able to create a better result compared to working alone. The more the people I am working with, the more ideas we could ponder in, and more the discussion, the better the final product will be. A good example that demonstrates the advantage of teamwork is my personal experience in science class. When I was in year 11, our class was asked to conjure a science research task. I first considered doing the project on myself, but I had failed to come up with a good topic. Also, even though I had a good topic, I was not confident that I could design and practice a good experiment. Just then, my best friend John came up to me and suggested a really good topic about kinetic energy of boiling water. Though a long discussion, we were able to design a valid method to test our hypothesis, and in the end we were able to get a solid score. In a saying it says "It takes two to take a tango", emphasizing the importance of teamwork. We are not perfect beings. Though working on a project, you might meet difficulties and barriers. However, the existence of a teammate will always become your greatest help.
In addition, forming a group helps me form friendships with other people. Relationships comes unexpectedly. By working on a project and discussing ideas with new people I meet, I could know them better and ultimately be close friends. For example, once, at the beginning of my school term, our biology teacher assigned us a project to a group consist of random students. I was a shy student, and working with new people I've never met was kind of awkward. However, as proceeding the project and having conversation with my co-workers, I was able to get closer to them as we not only made trivial conversations and jokes, but also discovered each other's personality and characteristics. Since then, I prefer to work as a team for the purpose of building and maintaing relationships.
in conclusion, it is better to work in a group rather than working on oneself. It gives you an opportunity to make new friends. Not only that, you could improve yourself and the product of your work by collaboration with others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...hy student, and working with new people Ive never met was kind of awkward. However,...
^^^
Line 5, column 646, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ons and jokes, but also discovered each others personality and characteristics. Since ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...uilding and maintaing relationships. in conclusion, it is better to work in a g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68173258004 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7617007381 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482109227872 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 778.5 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 9.59856630824 229% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4287232998 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0740740741 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.74074074074 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261494362154 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748739830653 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726203097977 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203154573629 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756502540482 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.