It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.
The landscape in which children are raised has huge influence upon children's development. Children raised up in different environments have different perspectives and characters. However, recently whether it is more beneficial for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city has aroused heated arguments among parents. People, nevertheless have conflicting ideas. While some people believe bringing up in a countryside is more beneficial since children could live in a calm and relaxing environment, others argue that living in urban areas is beneficial. In my opinion, it is better for children to be brought up in a big town rather than the countryside for the following two conspicuous reason. First, children could receive better education in the city. Also, various medical facilities provide better health care.
To begin with, children are more likely to benefit from a vast number of academic facilities in the city. Schools in cities have better facilities and equipment compared to schools in the countryside. In additional to school education, children living in cities are able to learn more from other forms of learning institutions such as private educational institutions. For example, most schools in a big town have a computer lab, library and sporting facilities that school from rural areas do not usually have. Moreover, students living in big cities have better chance to build up new relationships with many people. My own experience is a compelling example of this. After I have moved into New York, one of the biggest townin America, I was able to make friends with promising students and professors, and I am sure that I will hugely benefit from this relationship. For this reason, I strongly believe that it is beneficial to grow up in a large city.
In addition, children living in a big city have wider access to various health care services. Children are weak beings and nothing is important to children than getting immediate care when they are sick. In the city, there is a large number of medical facilities with high-tech equipment. Children in the city have easier access to regular health checkups and vaccinations. If they are sick, they can get appropriate treatment immediately. For example, when I was sick, I was promptly transported to a nearby hospital and get diagnosed and treated. As a result, I was able to recover from the disease easily. But, when I was sick in the countryside, I had to travel over 30 minutes in order to visit a nearby doctor. Sometimes, you have to drive more than an hour in order to visit a nearby dentist in the countryside. It is essential for children to access medical service immediately when they feel sick as they are more susceptible to various diseases and symptoms. Therefore, in order to children to maintain a healthy life, it is advantageous to live in big cities with better medical facilities.
In conclusion, it is better for children to be brought up in a big city than in countryside. This is because they are able to receive better education and health services.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...en they are sick. In the city, there is a large number of medical facilities with high-tech equip...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2564.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01761252446 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91530222441 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452054794521 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 820.8 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5504163569 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4137931034 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6206896552 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79310344828 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26923398589 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797386728242 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777481346005 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192016999298 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718081568085 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.