52-hertz whale
The reading passage and the lecture are about the 52-hertz whale, a whale that sings at an unusual frequency. The author of the article proposes several theories that explain how the high-pitched song originates. As reasonable as these points seem, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on them.
To begin with, the writer suggests that this whale might have been born in a combination with two different whale species, causing its sound to have hybrid of its parents. Conversely, disputing the reading's point, the lecturer claims that all-known hybrid whales will migrate with normal whales in the same pattern. Nevertheless, this 52-hertz whale has a unique pattern, in which it migrates alone. therefore, the lecturer rules out this theory.
Second, even though the author states that this whale probably has a damaged ability to hear which not only makes it unable to hear the normal sounds of other whales but causes it to sound differently since whales learn to sing by listening to other whales, the lecturer argues that it's a misconception. This is because he believes that whales make sounds depending on their throats. He attributes this unique sound to its special throat structure. Accordingly, the lecturer notes that the high-pitched sound has nothing to do with damaged ears.
Last but not least, the lecturer acutely identifies a weakness in the reading that this whale might be a rare species that most of them are now gone. He points out that if this whale is a rare species, it might have parents whose sounds can be detected before this one. Nonetheless, the equipment that is responsible for the sound monitoring didn't show any results. As a consequence, the lecturer has no confidence in this theory.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 400, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ue pattern, in which it migrates alone. therefore, the lecturer rules out this theory. S...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... other whales, the lecturer argues that its a misconception. This is because he bel...
^^^
Line 4, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...is responsible for the sound monitoring didnt show any results. As a consequence, the...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...turer has no confidence in this theory.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, conversely, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03135888502 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62459322594 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547038327526 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3134773956 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2666666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290823137104 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104879427891 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146068833609 0.0662205650399 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197097221743 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100095090957 0.0443174109184 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.