While scientists have attempted to explain the 52 hertz whale’s unusual song, each of their theories is flawed and the whale’s uniqueness remains a mystery.
The article states that there are three theories related to the unusual high pitch song of the 52-hertz whale, known as a specific kind of whale's species whose high pitch song is unusual among other species. However, the professor explains that these theories have not supported this unusual feature and refutes each author's reasons.
First, the reading states that perhaps the whale is hybrid. Each parent is from different species of whales. The professor opposes this point by saying that hybrid whales have a different route to migrate than others, while this whale migrate alone. Of course, if the whale were a hybrid, it would follow the same path for migration.
Second, the article posits that the whale may have difficulty hearing sounds, like a deaf person. In contrast, the professor says that the song comes from the throat, it is unlikely to be the same cause. He also states that the throat structure of the 52-hertz whale is different and unusual, whereas the hearing damaged has no connection with this organ.
Third, the reading says that the whale is likely the only member of rare species. The professor cast doubt on this point by explaining that the whale is unique if it has a parent. According to the professor, not so high pitch ever heard before this one. This means that the whale is unique indeed and has no parents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, whereas, while, in contrast, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8658008658 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20608541105 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536796536797 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4859183076 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4615384615 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33712072818 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11608110457 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688076128122 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209517757131 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718692647248 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.