about Agnostids
The main topic of both the passage and the lecture is about Agnostids that were extinct 450 million years ago and just some fossils remained. The passage claim that there are three theories about how Agnostids may have been lived. The professor on the other hand, completely denies whatever mentioned in the passage through citing several reasons.
First, both the passage and the lecture talk about Agnostids as swimming predators. According to the passage, Agnostids may have been swimming predators that hunted smaller animals. Because it is known that there are other types of arthropods were strong swimmers and active predators; as a result, Agnostids can be swimming predators too. However, the professor refutes this, stating that they can not be swimming predators because vision is so essential for predators so they can see and catch the prey. But as we know, Agnostids did not have good vision and maybe they were blind, plus they did not have other strong sense so that they can follow the preys.
Second, both the author and professor discuss Agnostids as seafloor dwellers. The author argues that Agnostids may have dwelled on the seafloor. Again there are some examples of other types of primitive anthropods living in this way; consequently, Agnostids can be lived like them too. In contrast, the professor points out that seafloor dwellers could not move fast and contribute in other places. Because they are so slow, as a result, there were some seafloor dwellers species that there were not in any other sites. But Agnostids were found in so many diffrent areas which means they were fast and they were not seafloor dwellers.
Lastly, both lecture and professor address the subject of Agnostids as parasites. The lecture goes on and mentions that there is a possibility that Agnostids were parasites, living on and feeding off larger animals. Because there are many parasites species of modern-day anthropods, so Agnostids could be like them. Nevertheless, the professor supports a contradictory view as compared to that of the passage; he describes that they could not be parasites. Because the parasites population always were limited, there were not so many of them. But Agnostids had a huge population, so they could not be parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...bout how Agnostids may have been lived. The professor on the other hand, completely...
^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parasites'' or 'parasite's'?
Suggestion: parasites'; parasite's
... larger animals. Because there are many parasites species of modern-day anthropods, so Ag...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 470, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parasites'' or 'parasite's'?
Suggestion: parasites'; parasite's
...hey could not be parasites. Because the parasites population always were limited, there w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 491, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'were'.
Suggestion: were always
...sites. Because the parasites population always were limited, there were not so many of them...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 10.4613686534 268% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 370.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12972972973 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55348055909 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437837837838 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 419.366225166 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2565695346 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280947728688 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112352216452 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101448589507 0.0662205650399 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194236157213 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062671766732 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.