Adult interference.
Both the passage and the lecture are regarding adult interference, and whether it has positive or negative impact on children. Although the author accentuates that if parents interfere to plays of children, it will suppress children from developing pivotal skills, the lecturer utterly contradicts this viewpoint for three core arguments.
Firstly, the author posits that interrupting plays of kids might damage their creativity since it will render kids not to utilize and enhance their imagination, not to mention creativity. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this claim by mentioning that sometimes children are prone to be involved in futile activities such as eating junk food, and sometimes they get in trouble, so parents have to encourage children to play stimulating games or toys, which will eventually, foster their creativity.
Secondly, from the perspective of the author, children have to develop peer role models, and thus, if adults disable them from doing so, it will prevent children from improving their social skills.However, the lecturer opposes this idea for children have to learn proper role models from their parents not from their peers, otherwise it will engender inappropriate disposition.
Thirdly, the author asserts that youngsters have to know how to protect themselves, and they have to solve the problems they encounter without the help of their parents. That being said, the lecturer rebuts this statement because youngsters don't know the consequences of their actions, and they have to trust their parents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is viewpoint for three core arguments. Firstly, the author posits that interrup...
^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...dren from improving their social skills.However, the lecturer opposes this idea for chi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ebuts this statement because youngsters dont know the consequences of their actions,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46666666667 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77427417935 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 21.2450331126 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.3236335899 49.2860985944 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.428571429 110.228320801 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 21.698381199 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.4285714286 7.06452816374 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0689251539763 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051800816671 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109758904061 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504325022758 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642328535133 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.3589403974 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.498013245 149% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.