Altruism of human and animals
In contrast to passage, which believes that both human being and animals show altruistic behavior, the lecturer contradicts the opinion. The lecturer believes that all the activities of human and animals, which seems altruistic to us is actually not selflessness acts. There lies some kind of benefits of doing these activities.
The passage explains that we, the social being share our food with our family members or with a people who is unknown to us without any interest. The lecturer refutes that this activities is not actually selfishness.
The second point made in the passage is to do with animal’s altuistic behavior. The passage mentions the name of Meekart to give an example of altruism among animals. According to the text, the sentinel of Meekart stand alone to guard against the predators and to give the signal of upcoming danger. The sentinel does not eat food, while the other members of the groups are engaged in searching for foods and eat the food. The sentinel provides the alert to other memebrs if it see any predator is coming so that other memebrs can go to the safe place and this might leave the life of sentinel in danger. Because it has few time to flee after convey the alarm. However, the speaker points out that the sentinel might eat before standing to guard and it has enough time to escape from danger because it first see the danger so that it has enough time to be in the safe place.
Finally, in contrast to the reading passage’s claim that donating organ to family members, relatives or even to outside people proves the altruism of human being. But the lecturer argues the claim and points out that by donating organ to other people s/he gets the appreciation from the society, which is not less than any monetary benefit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ny interest. The lecturer refutes that this activities is not actually selfishness....
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ivities is not actually selfishness. The second point made in the passage is to ...
^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... with animal's altuistic behavior. The passage mentions the name of Meekart to...
^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: STAND_ALONE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'standalone'?
Suggestion: standalone
...ng to the text, the sentinel of Meekart stand alone to guard against the predators and to g...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sees'?
Suggestion: sees
...ovides the alert to other memebrs if it see any predator is coming so that other me...
^^^
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...e of sentinel in danger. Because it has few time to flee after convey the alarm. However...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 881, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as enough time to be in the safe place. Finally, in contrast to the reading pass...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is not less than any monetary benefit.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81758957655 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4588066065 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514657980456 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.390044593 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.642857143 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144755615713 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477675393243 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690929779634 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812078403585 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617912684728 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.