Rembrandt's painting
The article states that the famous painting 'Portrait of an elderly woman' is not the painting of Rembrandt and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer believes that the painting is actually drew by Rembrandt and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that there is inconsistent how the woman is dressed in the portrait. However, the lecturer refutes this point. The professor explains that for color in the picture has been added later in order to increase the value of the picture. He also claims that because of addition of for color the dress of the woman in the portrait looks inconsistent, which is actually not attribute of the works of Rembrandt.
Second, the article claims that Rembrandt is master of light and shadow, which is absent in this painting. The lecturer refutes this point by stating that the color of the woman in the original painting was light color, which was a masterpiece of combination of light and shadow. But due to addition of addition of for color, the body color of the picture became vibrant and as a result the combination of light and shadow completely vanished.
Third, the article states that the painting was made on a panel, which made of several pieces of wood added together. However, the lecturer also contends this point. The lecturer explains that the original panel of the painting was made in a single panel. But because of addition of several parts, extra pieces of wood were added with the original panel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'drawn'.
Suggestion: drawn
... believes that the painting is actually drew by Rembrandt and refutes each of the au...
^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'addition of'.
Suggestion: addition of
...ination of light and shadow. But due to addition of addition of for color, the body color of the pictur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood were added with the original panel.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, look, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8862745098 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46037728061 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41568627451 0.540411800872 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2240765135 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8461538462 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179027787864 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722904132732 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895484309318 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135836270277 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122080934176 0.0443174109184 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.