Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what type of neighbor is the best to have?
-someone who is quiet
-someone who we are similar to
-someone who is supportive
Being social being, we are born to live in a society, in which people are cooperative and share each others' joys and sorrows. Neighbor are the first ones, whom we get at our beside firstly in any circumstances. As they have great effect on our day to daily life, we must have a congenial relationship with them and this relationship will resulted into mutual benefit. I personally, believe that the foremost and important prerequisite of a good neighbor is cooperative and supportive attitude. I assert this view because of two following reasons, which I will elaborate in the following few paragraphs.
First of all, I argue that the neighbor should be supportive. This is so because neighbors are the people, who will first come in any situations. They are the first person of getting informed in any kind of difficulties. But if the neighbors are not supportive then we will not get the proper help from them and it will resulted into great losses. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Because, few years back, I encountered fire in my apartment and as soon as my neighbors saw this they came to support me with all their resources. As a result, this fire did not cost me a lot. Therefore, I always possess that the people living next to your door must be supportive.
Secondly, neighbors are the people, who are always the first person to help us in case of any emergency and if these people are not cooperative then we have to numerous hazards. For instance, just one week before I was on leave from my organization and my wife was at her office. Then suddenly she fell sick and I had to go to her office for bringing her to see a doctor. But there was a concern that who will take care of my children. Then I knocked my neighbors and after telling my emergency situations, they welcomed my children to their house.
In conclusion, I believe that the neighbors should be supportive. This is so because they are the person who come to know about any emergency situation/difficulties before other person. If the neighbors are not supportive and do not have the cooperative mentality, it may result into huge damages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ip with them and this relationship will resulted into mutual benefit. I personally, beli...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...following few paragraphs. First of all, I argue that the neighbor should be supp...
^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e will not get the proper help from them and it will resulted into great losses. ...
^^
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
... the proper help from them and it will resulted into great losses. My personal experien...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out any emergency situation/difficulties before other person. If the neighbors ar...
^^
Line 6, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ality, it may result into huge damages.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6976127321 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89419458896 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0927107337 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3333333333 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19613698982 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632112809748 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564608448935 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13198293198 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183037005082 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.