Alturism
In this set of materials, the reading passage mention that the definition of altruism, which is the opposite definition of selfishness, and think of the other animals benefits. They define the term of altruism by using 2 examples with on both humans and animals. On the other hand, the lecturer finds all the idea is the same and provides some evidences to support the opinions with the same examples.
First of all, the article asserts that altruism is found on both animals and humans. In addition, the professor argue that this topic as a new founding on the science. The both of the materials give the same example on human. If the human donate of body organs, such as kidney, which is mentioned in lecture, with any strangers, the one performing as altruistic. Hence, the first reason of the passage is strong enough to support.
Furthermore, it is mentioned in the passage that many species of animals are also willing to share food or even their life. With the same idea, the lecturer believes that it is altruistic behavior. Both of them are mentioned same example with meerkat, even if it is fully stomach, immidiately alarm others to escape, and it takes itself in a danger. Therefore, this idea can be a logical meaning.
Finally, not only reading asserts the altruistic behavior, also lecture support.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-27 | NidhiKalani | 3 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | Rengin | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? High school should allow students to study the courses that students want to study. 73
- Some people learn by reading about things. Others learn by doing things. Which of these methods of learning is better for you? 60
- Alturism 3
- Fossil Fuels 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86222222222 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57875077422 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6639290332 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1538461538 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3076923077 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.