Alturism
Both the reading passage and the lecture talks about the alturism found in humans as well as the animals. While the reading passage talks about the positive aultrustic behaviour by giving specific example of humans and a mammal called meerkats, the lecture condradicts the passage statements by giving various reasons.
First of all, the passage asserts that humans reveal various altrustic behaviours by giving example of sharing of food with strangers and donation of organs like kidney to someone who need it. According to the text, the one who is performing the act gets little to no reward at all for the alturistic service. But the proffersor disagree on the ground that, when a person donates a kindey, he gets appreciation from the society, increase in self-esteem- which can be good rewards as well.
Secondly, the author of the passage blosters the argument by supporting it with a behavioural experiment's result which is done on a mammal callled meerkat. This mammal shows the alturistic attitude by keeping itself in a situation of danger by making alarming noise which indicates the rest of members who were buzy collecting the food for the team, about the arrival of the preditator. However, the lecture rejects the finding and futher elaborates that the closer study revealed different results which proves that the gurding meerkat has the advantage of escaping first when he sees the predictor. Moreover, the guarding meerkat has various other advantages like he has previlage of eating first then other members of the group, who were looking for the food for the rest of the group.
In sum, though the reading passage and the leacture both talks about the alturistc behaviours. But the lecture have given sufficient details and strong arguments which strongly negates the reading passage's arguments.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18918918919 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5857729395 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.909900983 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.636363636 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0344926818763 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199555409826 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631049614459 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0250292251035 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433518895533 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.