Apparently, there has been a debate about the new strategy that recently has been used by the advertising company, which is hiring a buzzer.
Apparently, there has been a debate about the new strategy that recently has been used by the advertising company, which is hiring a buzzer. Some people think that this new way is just a scam and the advertising companies are going to mislead the customers, as the author mention in the reading passage, while other people like the speaker in the listening has been adopted the opposite side of view and support his idea as much as he can.
First of all, the guy in the lecture asserts that the buzzer is actually says the truth and never laying on the customers, to state it more clearly, the buzzers are already using this product and he has a good experience with it, as a result of that, the company is hiring him as a buzzer. By this point, the speaker casts the doubt about the text assumption of the giving of the wrong information to the customers in order to make them buying their products.
Second, the listing claims that the customers are so aware and ask a lot of question before buying the product, then he adds, the whole customers that he met during his work as a buzzer, are asking him a lot of question like, the price, the service and how long he had been used this product, as long with this, the customers collect a good information about the product before buying it, admittedly, they don't rely on what the buzzer told them about the product. Indeed, the author point about the misinformation that the customers have been taken from the buzzer, is no longer being believable.
Finally, the buzzer raises a point regarding the issue mentioned in the reading passage which is the decrease of the trust between people because of the dishonesty of the buzzers, then, he adds, why the buzzer spread the dishonesty in the community, as long as, the customers who have used the product are already having a satisfying experience with this product ?. That in turn, have to increase the trust between people, not the opposite as the author says in the text.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd support his idea as much as he can. First of all, the guy in the lecture ass...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to make them buying their products. Second, the listing claims that the cust...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...duct before buying it, admittedly, they dont rely on what the buzzer told them about...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...buzzer, is no longer being believable. Finally, the buzzer raises a point regar...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, finally, first, regarding, second, so, then, while, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 352.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60795454545 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40755871127 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477272727273 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 21.2450331126 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.332287334 49.2860985944 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 202.75 110.228320801 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.0 21.698381199 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.375 7.06452816374 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325484828097 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197323282309 0.0996497079465 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.306703411124 0.0662205650399 463% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211070368895 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180792511491 0.0443174109184 408% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 13.3589403974 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.74 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.35 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.498013245 187% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.