The article states that the zebra mussel is spreading and it is not possible to stop this invasion and it poses a serious threst to freshwater population and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that controversy of what you read, zebra mussel is not a threat to fish population and he mentioned that the reason that they spread in tha past was that in the past people did not have enough knowledge and refute each of the author's reasons.
First, the article claims that the history of the zebra mussel's spread suggest that the invasion of them is unstoppable and mentioned that they can attache to themselves to the ships bottom and they are carried to a new place. The professor refutes this point by saying that they are some ways to cease zebra mussel from being transfered by ships to a new place. He states that these ships balest water when they reach to their distinction. If the ships balest their water in the ocean, these animals will die in the salty water.
Second, the reading posits that when zebra mussels are carried to a new place, the can dominate it as they are a hardy species. However, the professor assert that it is true at the begining butafter sometimes birds found new source of food which they can eat alot. According to professor zebra mussel cannot easily dominate.
Third, the article avers that zebra mussels are likely cause a decline in the overall fish population in habitats where they become dominant because they are a rival to fishes that eat plankton. The professor opposes this point by explaining that they may have negative impact on fishes that eat plankton but they have pros to other fishes. Based on the lecture, zebra mussel generate some nutrients. Thus, they are beneficial for other fishes that live bottom the water.
The article states that the zebra mussel is spreading and it is not possible to stop this invasion and it poses a serious threst to freshwater population and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that controversy of what you read, zebra mussel is not a threat to fish population and he mentioned that the reason that they spread in tha past was that in the past people did not have enough knowledge and refute each of the author's reasons.
First, the article claims that the history of the zebra mussel's spread suggest that the invasion of them is unstoppable and mentioned that they can attache to themselves to the ships bottom and they are carried to a new place. The professor refutes this point by saying that they are some ways to cease zebra mussel from being transfered by ships to a new place. He states that these ships balest water when they reach to their distinction. If the ships balest their water in the ocean, these animals will die in the salty water.
Second, the reading posits that when zebra mussels are carried to a new place, the can dominate it as they are a hardy species. However, the professor assert that it is true at the begining butafter sometimes birds found new source of food which they can eat alot. According to professor zebra mussel cannot easily dominate.
Third, the article avers that zebra mussels are likely cause a decline in the overall fish population in habitats where they become dominant because they are a rival to fishes that eat plankton. The professor opposes this point by explaining that they may have negative impact on fishes that eat plankton but they have pros to other fishes. Based on the lecture, zebra mussel generate some nutrients. Thus, they are beneficial for other fishes that live bottom the water.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252976190476 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.178571428571 0.158904122519 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0654761904762 0.0723426182421 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0267857142857 0.0435111971325 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0684523809524 0.0277247811725 247% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116071428571 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0267857142857 0.0370669169778 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.30105660991 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0386904761905 0.0208969081088 185% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.119047619048 0.128158765124 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0178571428571 0.0158828679856 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0208333333333 0.0114777025283 182% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1807.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 312.0 271.125827815 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79166666667 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.342948717949 0.374372842146 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.214743589744 0.287516216867 75% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.141025641026 0.187439937562 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0801282051282 0.113142543107 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30105660991 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.6793920472 53.8517498576 90% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3548348469 49.3711431718 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 132.220823453 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.878197800319 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 45.4743589744 50.5018328374 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.44565217391 1.90840788429 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.614194774941 0.549887131256 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.169328156077 0.142949733639 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.122896068872 0.0787303798458 156% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.613667824294 0.631733273073 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167005524161 0.139662658121 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.258720646538 0.266732575781 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218684264687 0.103435571967 211% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.423849336174 0.414875509568 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0590050691361 0.0530846634433 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.435499483658 0.40443939384 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.235005816995 0.0528353158467 445% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.