The reading states that there are several reasons that an asteroid would be the best colonization option for living and working on them. On the other hand, the lecturer finds all the reasons mentioned by the reading dubious and refutes them all by specific details.
First, the reading states that low gravity on asteroids is very good for starting life on them because it would be easier for the spacecraft to take off again, and the spaceship would needles fuel. On the contrary, the professor mentioned the fact that low gravity presents some risks too, such as damage to muscles, and bone density on the spaceship.
Furthermore, the author argues that an asteroid colony would be extremely profitable and a good source of rheas raw materials. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the cost of these mining metals is very much, and is not a good idea to expending that much money on this project, also supply this metal is very difficult.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that asteroids are easy to reach, and they are a good option for colonization, and some of them get closer to Earth than our Moon. In contrast, the professor dismisses this issue due to the fact that the ability of easy to reach is not meaning there are easy to return, even it was close to getting to is not easy to get back from them and it would be a challenge for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'needle'
Suggestion: needle
...take off again, and the spaceship would needles fuel. On the contrary, the professor me...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... fact that the ability of easy to reach is not meaning there are easy to return, even it was c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'get'?
Suggestion: get
...re easy to return, even it was close to getting to is not easy to get back from them an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61224489796 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3847844769 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522448979592 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2091746279 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.625 21.698381199 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.875 7.06452816374 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0980849677231 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480159356768 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04690801246 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565610896028 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136011333209 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.