It is clearly understood that in such a sophisticated world, the personal and work life is very challenges for everyone. Some people believe the challenges that young people face today are not very different from the challenges that old people faced when they were young. Whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective. As far as I am concerned, by passing the time almost everything’s get change, so I believe that nowadays-young people face different challenges in compare with their parents and grandparents. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the shape of activities get change by passing the time. On the other hand, developing of technology makes everything complicated. For example when my parents was in my age they got married and migration from countryside to capital, and starting their lives. They find their job easily and improved in their professional job very soon, but today I have no job and it not easy to be improve in my career. In addition, with developing of technology, the old jobs become useless and the young people should adapt themselves with such a changes.
Another reason which should be taken into consideration, is that by passing the time face of responsibility getting change, in this case our parents, and grandparents were more responsible person than our is. For example, my mother berth me in my age and become a perfect mother, but I never could imagine myself as a mother. On the country, I believe that I am not ready for such huge responsibility, and I think for me it would be ten years later.
To put it briefly, if one weighs the merits and demerits of the aforementioned statement, one soon realizes that the personal life, and work-related always changing by changing the time, and nothing stay the same with the past. Nowadays young people face with many thing that was not an issue in past, also our parents involve with different problem that are not very important now. Therefore, I believe comparing the past time with now is not a proper comparing. In the past our parents, and grandparents, and today we are all faced with challenges that make our personality.
In fact, there is a myriad of other reasons, supporting the above statement, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... old people faced when they were young. Whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspe...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 580, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a change' or simply 'changes'?
Suggestion: a change; changes
...eople should adapt themselves with such a changes. Another reason which should be taken...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 260, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
...e past. Nowadays young people face with many thing that was not an issue in past, also our...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 293, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...e with many thing that was not an issue in past, also our parents involve with differen...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 418, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...now. Therefore, I believe comparing the past time with now is not a proper comparing. In ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, i think, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92288557214 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88912223717 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514925373134 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2120176857 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.944444444 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358775997705 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994990891573 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12701411214 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178974588599 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153509083273 0.0645574589148 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.