The author states that 4 working days per week will be benefitials for both emplyees and businesses and the author provides three reasons for this. In response the professor explains that reducing the workingweek by a day is benefities for employees and businesses but the professor mentioned that the article provides weak unconvincing points.
First the reading states that high cost of gas and vehicle maintaince will eleminates expenses and give the employees the opportuninty to use that amount of money to cover other costs. However the professor refutes that by explaing that in fact emplyees spend 30 miles to go to their work which costs 15-20 dollar and annualy cost is around 850 dollar. He mentioned that this cost isn't enough to cut a day of work.
Secondly, the author expalins that by eleminating one day business ,companies will not only save significantly on operating expenses but also have the additional benefit of a more efficient workforce continually energized with a 3-day weekend. On the other hand the lecturer explains that this theory is misguided where in fact the businesses that run for 5 day a week to change in 4 days of work in a week will led to 20% lost, additional the 2 more hours in 4 work day will not make any difference because it will be late and all protentional costumers would have gone.
Third, the article points that with a reduced workweek, they will spend an extra day with their children and other loved ones, helping to improve their overall quality of life and thus sending them back to work happier. In contrast the professor opposes that point by stating that this won't add more time with family for the employees. The employees have to find day care facility with extended to take care for the kids which would be a difficulte and sressful task for the parents. Also for the employees that their kids are in school, they will not spend more time with their kids because kids are usually in school in the first half of the day. As a result according to the proffesor this author provided weak theories for 4 working days change.
First the reading states that high cost of gas and vehicle maintaince will eleminates expenses and give the employees the opportuninty to use that amount of money to cover other costs. However the professor refutes that by explaing that in fact emplyees spend 30 miles to go to their work which costs 15-20 dollar and annualy cost is around 850 dollar. He mentioned that this cost isn't enough to cut a day of work.
Secondly, the author expalins that by eleminating one day business ,companies will not only save significantly on operating expenses but also have the additional benefit of a more efficient workforce continually energized with a 3-day weekend. On the other hand the lecturer explains that this theory is misguided where in fact the businesses that run for 5 day a week to change in 4 days of work in a week will led to 20% lost, additional the 2 more hours in 4 work day will not make any difference because it will be late and all protentional costumers would have gone.
Third, the article points that with a reduced workweek, they will spend an extra day with their children and other loved ones, helping to improve their overall quality of life and thus sending them back to work happier. In contrast the professor opposes that point by stating that this won't add more time with family for the employees. The employees have to find day care facility with extended to take care for the kids which would be a difficulte and sressful task for the parents. Also for the employees that their kids are in school, they will not spend more time with their kids because kids are usually in school in the first half of the day. As a result according to the proffesor this author provided weak theories for 4 working days change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t amount of money to cover other costs. However the professor refutes that by explaing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...0 dollar and annualy cost is around 850 dollar. He mentioned that this cost isnt enou...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...50 dollar. He mentioned that this cost isnt enough to cut a day of work. Secondly,...
^^^^
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugh to cut a day of work. Secondly, the author expalins that by eleminating one ...
^^
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ins that by eleminating one day business ,companies will not only save significant...
^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ek to change in 4 days of work in a week will led to 20% lost, additional the 2 m...
^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...hange in 4 days of work in a week will led to 20% lost, additional the 2 more hour...
^^^
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dditional the 2 more hours in 4 work day will not make any difference because it ...
^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...s sending them back to work happier. In contrast the professor opposes that point by sta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 485, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ulte and sressful task for the parents. Also for the employees that their kids are i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thus, in contrast, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64077669903 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43670624226 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546925566343 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.2420644166 49.2860985944 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.4 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37307487187 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151643066359 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862651127857 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234964983245 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874389484122 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.