Autonomous cars
The reading and the lecture are both about autonomous cars.
Whereas the author of the reading states that driverless will provide benefits for our life, the lecturer suggests that they have some problems.
The lecturer casts doubts on the main points made by in the article by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, there a lot of car accidents are caused by drivers, and such inventions will prevent from these. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that there are a lot of inventions has done by people that have some errors, and driverless also will have.
Seconds, the reading states that driverless cars can communicate with one another which will decline the level of pollutions. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this point . He says that by providing such chance people will not need license, and will try spend time under road that promote to raise the level of pollutions.
Finally, the reading claims that passenger in the car instead of concentrating on the road they could another useful things. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that When people have extra time they usually do unimportant things such as watching videos, so that there is no distinguish if the driverless provide them time.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about autonomous cars, the three main reasons made in the article are effectively challenged by the professor
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both about autonomous cars. ...
^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one by people that have some errors, and driverless also will have. Seconds, th...
^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... communicate with one another which will decline the level of pollutions. Neverth...
^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...theless, the lecturer refutes this point . He says that by providing such chance p...
^^
Line 13, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... effectively challenged by the professor
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, whereas, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12340425532 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55196988088 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544680851064 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8730555152 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133779747801 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511483922098 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062943811482 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670551612985 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564516908902 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.