bees
Both the reading and the listening discuss whether the fossil found in Arizona are the fossil of bees or not. The former argues that they are not the fossil of bees and give three specific reasons for that whereas the latter contradicts all the points made by the reading.
First of all, the author contends that, since no fossil of bee have ever been found more then 100 million years age and the founded fossil is more than 200 million age so this are not hte fossile of the bees. However, the lecturer argues that, the fossilization of the bees need a special kind of liquid regine which were not present on 200 million years ago. Moreover, he adds that bees may be present on those days but the the right kind of regine to fossilized bees were not available.
Secondly, the reading asserts that, since bees feed on flowring plants and the flowring plants evolve first on earth on 125 million yeas ago s this fossil are not the bees fossil. In contrast, the lecturer rebuts that, very early bees may not feed on the flowring trees . they might feed fren or pine type trees. In additin, he adds that it might also be possible that when the flowring plant evolve, bees change their feeding habit from fren to flowring plants and stable for hte next generation.
Finally, the text claims that, the the fossilized structure lack sone exclusive details from th present day's bees since it lacks spiral pattern cap. On the other hand, the listening counters that, the chemical composotion of the nest resemble same type og chemical materials of the fossilized bees' nest. Both contain a chemical that have a wax like substance to prevent water to come in the bests. Thus those fossil may be the fossile of the present days bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...fossil of bee have ever been found more then 100 million years age and the founded f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...t bees may be present on those days but the the right kind of regine to fossilized bees...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...t bees may be present on those days but the the right kind of regine to fossilized bees...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...lion yeas ago s this fossil are not the bees fossil. In contrast, the lecturer rebut...
^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... bees may not feed on the flowring trees . they might feed fren or pine type trees...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...es may not feed on the flowring trees . they might feed fren or pine type trees. In ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...tion. Finally, the text claims that, the the fossilized structure lack sone exclusiv...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...tion. Finally, the text claims that, the the fossilized structure lack sone exclusiv...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... to prevent water to come in the bests. Thus those fossil may be the fossile of the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fossil' or 'those fossils'?
Suggestion: this fossil; those fossils
...revent water to come in the bests. Thus those fossil may be the fossile of the present days ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, whereas, in contrast, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64169381107 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17470188798 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511400651466 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8451644716 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.615384615 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33440362484 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149279295349 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10172980536 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230545780727 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044677038999 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.