Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to succeed in study or job, the ability to adjust or adapt to changing conduction or circumstance is more important than having knowledge
Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether the pyramids building theory. The former argues that the theories in the reading are not valid for the following three reasons.
First of all the 1st theory said that a long and straight ramp was able to carry large stone to the upper part of the pyramids to construct the total structure. In contrast, the lecturer argues that building such a ramp need a 1.5 km long and 160 m tall ramp, and the space was also massive to carry such a ramp. Moreover, this needs the ramp mass more than the actual pyramids mass which seems unpractical.
Secondly, the second theory predicts that the ramp supports the work internally with the help of massive cranes that can transport the heavy block of rock. However, the professor rebuts that it is impossible to build since it had to be sealed with the structure and also carry such massive block at 90 degrees is impossible. He further added that it need such types of crane which were unavailable in Egypt at that time and they had to import them from Lebanon and there is no relics of such type of ramp been discovered in Egypt.
Finally, The text claims that the blocks were built by crushing the limestone into a powder then cementing it into the block and also support that theory with some x-ray evidence. On the other hand, the listening counts that, this synthesize process was discovered about 2000 years after the pyramids were built and also contends that the x-ray results might have been from the result of reconstruction or repairing of the pyramids not of the time of its building.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'ramp' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ramps'.
Suggestion: ramps
... ramp need a 1.5 km long and 160 m tall ramp, and the space was also massive to carr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no relics'?
Suggestion: there are no relics
...hey had to import them from Lebanon and there is no relics of such type of ramp been discovered in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 281.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67615658363 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31640069656 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555160142349 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.355819234 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.4 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 5.45110844103 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0476105895736 0.236089414692 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207538763528 0.076458572812 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0175974978788 0.0737576698707 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0280202415534 0.150856017488 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00460477220222 0.0645574589148 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.