Cane toad
The passage is mainly about measures that can be taken to prevent rapid spread of can toad in Australia. This amphibian is native to Central and South America but latter introduce to Australia. In the lecture professor states that it can prevent the rapid spread of the frog, but the methods suggested in the passage will not be effective. She provides following facts to prove her claim.
The first method suggested in the paragraph is to build a national fence to prevent moving to unaffected region. The professor argues that this would not work as, young toads and eggs can move to other regions using streams. Since these species are rapidly spreading even few eggs or toads will enough to do a damage.
Second suggestion in the passage is to encourage massive volunteer groups to capture and destroy cane frogs. The lecturer states that this would do more harm as, large groups of uneducated volunteers can mistakenly kill native frogs. This is because it can be difficult to differentiate frogs, especially the young ones.
Third, is to develop and use a disease-causing virus to control cane toad population. In point of view of the professor, this can unbalance the ecosystems globally, especially in Central and South America, where the native lands of the frogs. She explains this could happen because, researches and animal specialist could transport, and virus infected reptiles and amphibian species to those countries. Then cane frogs in those lands can get infected. This is not expected as it will unbalance their native eco-system.
According to above reasonings, she provide facts to why the methods mentioned in the passage could be ineffective and moreover those could create much worse problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'damage'.
Suggestion: damage
...ven few eggs or toads will enough to do a damage. Second suggestion in the passage is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
.... According to above reasonings, she provide facts to why the methods mentioned in t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14184397163 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66064281143 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535460992908 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8048093837 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.625 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0625 7.06452816374 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162854465842 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591396971701 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909355516166 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805392322453 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590635352518 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.