cave painting of Lascaux
The passage presents some persumably possible support for the speculation that the Lascaux cave paintings were purposed to secure a successful hunt. The lecturer, however, refutes all the arguments that are presented in the reading, and he claims there is no factual evidence confirming this hypothesis. His further demonostrations are as follows.
Firstly, although some of the animal subjects of the Lascaux paintings were the hunting prey of people at that time, many of them did not fall under that category; such as Rhinasors or cats. Additionally, according to evidence, the most frequently hunted animal at that time was raindeer, which was not depicted in the Lascaux paintings at all. Moreover, only a small number of animal images were portrayed wounded by arrows or spears. Hence, the connection of the paintings with hunting cannot be observed.
Secondly, while the drawings of humans with animal heads were indeed present in the Lascaux, the association of these paintings with hunting cannot be inferred from this fact, as the aformentioned human figures were not hunting in the pictures, or even standing up. In fact, the humans with animal heads depictions were lying on their backs as if they were sleeping. Thus, the purpose of these paintings has not been identified yet.
Finally, whereas it is true that depictions could possess magical influences in the eyes of ancient communities, their relations to hunting cannot be readily concluded. Some populations used to believe that their ancestors' spirits are present in animals. Therefore, by making the Lascaux cave paintings of animals, they may have been striving to perform rituals and connect to their past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ns are as follows. Firstly, although some of the animal subjects of the Lascaux painting...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ascaux paintings at all. Moreover, only a small number of animal images were portrayed wounded by...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31343283582 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73705666206 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4800577955 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.538461538 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282824087398 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10123815672 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113407124395 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173090415698 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345907295484 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.