coal power plant ash new regulation
The article states that new strict law and regulation for stopping the pollution of the coal power plant is wholeheartedly unnecessary and he provides three reasons for support. Conversely, the professor explains that without such strict regulation, it is quite hard to decimate the trash of coal and he refutes each and every point of the author.
First, the reading claims that already taken regulation is sufficient to prevent leakage between the soil and coal plant of the contaminated surroundings as coal plant authority earnestly uses a special material of liner. Turning to the other side of the argument, the professor opposes this viewpoint that liner is only used at the time of new building of the plant. But in most of the old plant it is not followed, which is why strict rule surely oblige the authority to make line rigid to prevent the leakage so that there will be no chances to spoil the crops.
Second, the article posits that, nowadays authority is quite concern about recycling coal ash and people uses recycled ash products efficiently. In this meanwhile, if law is alerted, mass people will lose their inclination to buy those products. In this respect, the lecture opines a different outlook and says that in the recycled product there is mercury which is very dangerous for health. At now, if regulation is not applied, these will circulate among the products and people will be afraid.
Third, the author asserts that strict new regulations would eventually create the prices the cost of disposal and handling ten times higher than at now, no doubt. He further describes it consequently increases the price electricity and make pressure on the users. On the other hand professor is reciprocal of this opinion. He states that if focus is notified in disposal, it will ensure cost a lot but finally it will have lower impact than what they think. Additionally, he says it only will create 1% increment of the price electricity which is very tolerable to the consumers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, if, look, second, so, third, while, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96130952381 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65761477877 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53869047619 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4594097047 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.071428571 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274623701451 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771782925329 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955081868959 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158239392865 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854511932635 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.