The main topic is defined as a difficult choice between classical voting systems and computerized versions of an election. The reading is about advantages of electronic voting systems with examples from everyday life. The lecturer opposes ideas and reasons provided by the author in the reading and tells that it is hardly to believe that computer voting system is possible to use.
Firstly, the author tells that there is no chance to make a mistake when a person vote on a computer. He explains that for many residents with disabilities it may be much easier to choose a picture of a particular candidate on the screen, than trying to find him on a piece of paper. The speaker opposes that idea by providing an explanation, that for people who know technology well it will be very easy, but for elder people it may be stressful because of the fear of new unknown systems.
Secondly, in the reading it is said that a program can’t make a mistake during calculating the people’s votes, because the process is fully automated and humans don’t take part in it. However, the lecturer explains that the program can be made wrong and because of lack of physical copies of votes, the program is able to lose all the votes and as a result the election will fail.
Finally, the author of the reading provides an example of bank’s systems that are used for transactions and many other financial operations among many people in the world. He emphasizes, that it can be a good example of well working system. On the other hand, the speaker explains that financial organizations spend huge amounts of money to service and maintain such systems and, in the case of a poll that takes place once in two or four years, it can be very expensive and inefficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...stems with examples from everyday life. The lecturer opposes ideas and reasons prov...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79804560261 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66669230784 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537459283388 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8253007251 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.909090909 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177286212233 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738120916458 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355328371626 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108337412528 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411613796969 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.