decrease in the tendency to read literature.
The reading is about a decrease in the tendency to read literature. The author believes in this statment and provides three consequence of it. the lecturer challenges the statments made by authtor. She is off the opinion that none of these is true.
First of all, the author suggests that apart from literature, none of the other fields can provide the intellectual imagination. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. She says that science, history, and politics can also improve imagination ability as well as literature.
Secondly, the writer contends that the decline in resing literature can be lowered the cultural level of a society because nowadays people are more interested in watching a music video or reading a web page instead of reading a novel or poems. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that music and movies are the contemporary source of impression since the cultures change over the time.
Finaly, it is stated ine the reading that at this time, publishers invest in the litreture less than past since the number of readers decrease. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits this by mentioning that it is writers inperfection because their literature is hard to understand in comparsion with the previous ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rebuts this by asserting that music and movies are the contemporary source of im...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1756097561 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78313951433 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614634146341 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.8423548836 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4545454545 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252045097737 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10530025445 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.233820956351 0.0662205650399 353% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143142634872 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121910283411 0.0443174109184 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.