The reading states that there are several reasons that bees do not exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago. The lecturer, on the other hand, finds all the reasons mentioned by the reading dubious and refutes them all by specific details.
First, the reading states that no fossil remains of actual bees have ever been found that date to 200 million years ago. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up the idea that maybe the reason for that is that bees could not be preserved as fossils at that time. Fossil bees have typically been preserved in fossilized tree resin, and trees with this type of resin were very rare 200 million years ago.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that flowering plants do not exist in that period. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that before flowering plants appeared on Earth. Those very early bees might have been feeding on non-flowering plants.
Finally, the author argues that chambers of modern bee nests are closed by caps that have a spiral pattern, but the fossilized chambers lack such caps. That suggests the fossilized structures were made by other insects. the speaker dismisses this issue because there is chemical evidence that supports the theory that bees built the chambers. When the fossilized chambers were chemically analyzed, it turned out that they contain the same kind of material.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... structures were made by other insects. the speaker dismisses this issue because th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, kind of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9356223176 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28364900392 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56652360515 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4366042021 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.8333333333 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433756066728 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144648770061 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127675799818 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220631308952 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113165118072 0.0443174109184 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.