The passage offers three arguments protesting that the old fossil structures inside 200-million-year -old fossilized trees was made by bees, all of which are dismissed by the lecture.
First off, the author points out that actual bees dates back to 100 million years ago which is proved by the remaining fossils of bees. In contrast, the professor claims that no fossils does not mean no actual bees 200 million years ago, for the reason that bees can only be preserved by something the trees secrete, which, at that time, is too rare to preserve bees.
Second, the professor argued that bees several years before might not feed on flowers of flowering plants as present, chances were good that what they fed on were flowers of non-flowering plants.
In addition, as for the fact that there had not found something like the caps in the fossilized structures, which is used to close the chambers of modern bee nests, the professor says that there is another evidence to defend herself. Both fossilized structures and modern bee nests share the same chemical matters in a structure functioning like a water proof.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...tters in a structure functioning like a water proof.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, as for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 188.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96276595745 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5527204796 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632978723404 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 419.366225166 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8266927 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.5 110.228320801 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 21.698381199 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367364806393 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178777221183 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957437969244 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208240125798 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111613829976 0.0443174109184 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.