The passage offers three arguments protesting that the old fossil structures found inside 200-million-year-old fossilized trees was made by bees, all of which are dismissed by the lecture.
First off, while the lecturer concedes that no bee fossil of 200 million years old was found, she claims that no fossils does not mean no actual bees. The reason is that bees can only be fossilized by stick liquids produced by certain tree species, which, unfortunately at that time, is too rare to preserve bees.
Second, the professor does accept that modern bees survive on flowering plants, but she does not believe that this had to apply to 200 million years ago. Chances were good that what they subsisted on were other plants, and that it was only after flowering plants evolve that bees began to adapt to a different way to survival.
In addition, although she admits no cap of spiral pattern was found in the structure, she points to another evidence that links the structure with modern bee nests. For example, chemical analysis suggests that both fossilized structures and modern bee nests share the same water-proof material.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as found in the structure, she points to another evidence that links the structur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 188.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0585106383 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6305813285 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 419.366225166 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 17.1832856614 49.2860985944 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 135.857142857 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366134448585 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163714184607 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107259393425 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226254067176 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957426939453 0.0443174109184 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.