The article claims that dinosaurs are endotherms and provides two reasons of support. However, the listening explains that the ideas stated in the article is not enough to justify that dinosaurs are endotherms and refutes each of the authors reasons.
First, the article posits that dinosaurs are endotherms as their fossils in polar region indicates that they could live in cold climates. However, the lecture opposes this by saying that polar arear were much warmer than today. So, this information is not enough to say that dinosaurs were endotherms. Again, the lecture also states that, if they were in polar region with extreme cold, they would have hybernated themselves for moved somewhere else.
Second, the article claims thatdinosaurs were endotherms as their position of legs matches with the endotherms. The lecture refutes this reason by saying that the legs are beneath their body not beacuse they were endotherms but for the size of their huge body. This position of legs could hold more weight than the legs beside the body.
Third, The article states that dinosaurs were endotherms because of their body structure containing Haversian canals. However, the lecture explains that, although this is true about the dinosaurs, their body structures also contained growth ring. It might be the cause of their rapid growth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26635514019 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40198279669 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509345794393 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2643784702 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9166666667 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278852901678 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131966878405 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134142112152 0.0662205650399 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205372915507 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120623416562 0.0443174109184 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.