Both the writing and the professor lecture is discussing the question of if dinosaurs were endotherm animal. While the scientist in the writing provide reasons to support that dinosaurs were endotherms, the professor argues otherwise. The controversial topic has three main points as below.
First of all, the professor leans to the side that even though dinosaur lived through the polar era, the temperature was warmer than it is nowadays. This has proved the reason from the writing to be wrong as they believe if polar era was cold while dinosaur can live through lead to the chance that they were endotherms. However, warmer temperature as information provided from professor has proved this point invalid.
The professor also questions the supporting fact of legs position. The scientist believe that leg positioning under the body is the feature of high energy endotherm animal with lots of running. However, professor strongly believes the reason for this leg positioning is to support the animal body weight. Therefore, the reason behind natural section make leg position here is not necessary to list dinosaur as endotherms
The last point discussed was the about their bones structure. Even though Haversian canals is the feature of endotherm as found in dinosaur bone structure. However, the professor points out a more visible bone structure, which is the growth rings, to specify reptile. Growth rings has shown the growth rate of dinosaur was depended on the temperature which identified them more of reptile.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...ng fact of legs position. The scientist believe that leg positioning under the body is ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28278688525 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6377496201 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532786885246 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6258103957 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1538461538 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279198684047 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109132842275 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116373913914 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176412999444 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585242088456 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.