Discussion about online encyclopedia and traditional encyclopedia's advantages and disadvantages
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not the online communal encyclopedia is better to use widely. The article strongly postulates that even though this online version has many appeals, it has also several issues that make it more undesirable than the traditional one. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that the author's criticism based on his ignorance and shallow understanding of the true meaning of this version.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, a lot of amateur subscribers may make its information more imprecise. However, the traditional encyclopedia is prepared by experts who have strong backgrounds in this field. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that everything has own errors and it will never become perfect at any time. Likewise, the online encyclopedia has also some mistakes; however, the excerpts are working hard in this problem. Furthermore, she asserts that if the printed version has errors, it will remain for decades compared to the online one.
Secondly, the professor in the lecture further said that protecting from malicious hackers, the experts implemented a new strategy that is a requirement to fill out the crucial information about the user. These claims refute the writer's implications about this platform is vulnerable in front of hackers and cyber crimes because it doesn't notify their users about being hacked.
The article lastly points out that the communal online encyclopedia has too broad topics, so it leads them to make an unfavourable impression on their users. The speaker in the listening counters these indications by insisting that traditional versions have limited space to publish their works, so they have to cut off some parts which someone interests articles. Moreover, this online encyclopedia gives numerous opportunities to experience many diverse topics which also reflect well public viewpoints.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not the online communal encyclopedia is bet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...listening adamantly delineates that the authors criticism based on his ignorance and sh...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... of hackers and cyber crimes because it doesnt notify their users about being hacked. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, likewise, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49342105263 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85006651767 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608552631579 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2593654605 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.461538462 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222036551762 0.272083759551 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791325088943 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663569214889 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130235380194 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347912139209 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.