TPO 29-Integrated writing
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions on whether or not edmontosaur dinosaurs migrated to another area to escape from the unfavourable weather condition. The article strongly postulates that there are three explanations which support this statement. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that none of the author's explanations is plausible.
First and foremost, according to the professor, there was no need to migrate for these animals because at that time the climate was much warmer than today. Furthermore, she said that in North Slope reached peak temperature in the summer, so there were plenty of favourable conditions for vegetation to grow. To be more specific, especially in the wintertime, most of the dead plants still contained nutrition for essential to edmontosaur's survival. Nonetheless, the author offsets these points by declaring that these dinosaurs mostly fed on plants which became scarce in the winter, thus this condition led them to seek for another habitat.
On top of this, the lecturer further asserts that there were plenty of reasons why they lived in the horde. For instance, it might have used as extra protection from predators and other dangers even the same for other animals which lived near them. These claims refute the writer's indications about these dinosaurs' many relics were found from the same area, so it might illustrate that they lived in the flock. In addition to this, moving in herds allowed them to navigate their journey.
Lastly, the speaker in the lecture suggests that there were also juvenile dinosaurs in their swarm. it means that the migration was impossible for them because the young edmontosaurs had not adapted to run such long distances. Nevertheless, the author counters these implications by insisting that they were physically capable to run fast during this migration even in the cold weather.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...nd lecture have conflicting opinions on whether or not edmontosaur dinosaurs migrated to anoth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...also juvenile dinosaurs in their swarm. it means that the migration was impossible...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, lastly, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, thus, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30794701987 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70960691807 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592715231788 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4965461273 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316888631385 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954154866674 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491128072832 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17860828691 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363889585065 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.