The reading states that dinosaurs were endotherms and author provides reasons threef support. However, the professor explains that dinosaurs were not actually an endothers animal and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the articles claims that dinosaurs fossils were found in polar region taht support endotherms theory. The professor opposes this point by states that polar region are warmer today. Probably dinosaurs are migrated to the warmer ares and after that warmer region goint to cold and fossils were found that areas. She said that this animal were not actually endothers.
Secondly, the reading posits that leg position and movement are storngly suggests for endotherms. However, the professor says that though leg position were benefit for dinosaurs, it need to control massive weight of dinosaurs. She also points that dinosaurs leg position is advantages for running and this phenomena is very much common for dinosaurs without supports of endotherms principles.
Finally, the articles says that Haversian canals also adheres to endotherms behaviours. the professor opposes this point by said that though dinosaurs had high bone structure, in bone structure there were present growing ring that oppose the endotherms behaviours. She claims that dinosaurs grow rapidly then slowly and finally grownig stop at constant growing rate. Additionaly, then again growing rapidly and that is case for dense haversian canals and is nothing to do with edotherms thery.
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether the dinosaurs were endotherms which are defined as controlling their temperature without any relation between them and their internal heat or not. The article strongly postulates that the dinosaurs could control their internal temperature. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates those creatures could not manage their heat on account of several compelling reasons.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt that fossil of dinosaurs was found in polar regions which meant they had to maintain their temperature in order to survive in harsh climate change. Nonetheless, the professor offsets these points by declaring that dinosaurs have been discovered in the Arctic was the truth but these regions were more pleasant and much warmer in the past than today. Moreover, it is a possible conjecture that they had been migrating to warmer country or hibernating during the cold climate.
On top of this, the professor in the listening elaborates by bringing up the point that the second evidence which is about the legs position and movement is slightly unreasonable because it also has another possibility which is the legs position didn't just only represent the endotherm it also claims that it had supported large amounts of their weight because dinosaurs were very large size. these claims refute the writer's implications which about endotherm creatures had legs those positioned in underneath of their body. If they were not, these animals would the same as legs position of crocodiles and reptiles.
The text lastly insists that the bone structure of dinosaurs well known as Haversian canals allowed to grow more quickly and it was also a feature of endotherm animals. However, the speaker in the lecture counters the indications by asserting that these bones are characteristic of maintaining their internal temperature but more importantly it presents growth rings of those animals. these rings thickening in the cooler period so dinosaurs stopped or slowed to grow at that time but in the warmer season came they had been continuing to grow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elaborates by bringing up the point that the second evidence which is about the l...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'legs'' or 'leg's'?
Suggestion: legs'; leg's
... the second evidence which is about the legs position and movement is slightly unrea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... possibility which is the legs position didnt just only represent the endotherm it al...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erm it also claims that it had supported large amounts of their weight because di...
^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...because dinosaurs were very large size. these claims refute the writers implications ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'growing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: growing
... well known as Haversian canals allowed to grow more quickly and it was also a feature ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...presents growth rings of those animals. these rings thickening in the cooler period s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31578947368 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70209612785 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538011695906 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0008903083 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.5 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175960335237 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064338115441 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361073000197 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101103030611 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220236271829 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.