The reading states that dinosaurs were endotherms and author provides reasons threef support. However, the professor explains that dinosaurs were not actually an endothers animal and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the articles claims that dinosaurs fossils were found in polar region taht support endotherms theory. The professor opposes this point by states that polar region are warmer today. Probably dinosaurs are migrated to the warmer ares and after that warmer region goint to cold and fossils were found that areas. She said that this animal were not actually endothers.
Secondly, the reading posits that leg position and movement are storngly suggests for endotherms. However, the professor says that though leg position were benefit for dinosaurs, it need to control massive weight of dinosaurs. She also points that dinosaurs leg position is advantages for running and this phenomena is very much common for dinosaurs without supports of endotherms principles.
Finally, the articles says that Haversian canals also adheres to endotherms behaviours. the professor opposes this point by said that though dinosaurs had high bone structure, in bone structure there were present growing ring that oppose the endotherms behaviours. She claims that dinosaurs grow rapidly then slowly and finally grownig stop at constant growing rate. Additionaly, then again growing rapidly and that is case for dense haversian canals and is nothing to do with edotherms thery.
The reading states that dinosaurs were endotherms and author provides reasons threef support. However, the professor explains that dinosaurs were not actually an endothers animal and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the articles claims that dinosaurs fossils were found in polar region taht support endotherms theory. The professor opposes this point by states that polar region are warmer today. Probably dinosaurs are migrated to the warmer ares and after that warmer region goint to cold and fossils were found that areas. She said that this animal were not actually endothers.
Secondly, the reading posits that leg position and movement are storngly suggests for endotherms. However, the professor says that though leg position were benefit for dinosaurs, it need to control massive weight of dinosaurs. She also points that dinosaurs leg position is advantages for running and this phenomena is very much common for dinosaurs without supports of endotherms principles.
Finally, the articles says that Haversian canals also adheres to endotherms behaviours. the professor opposes this point by said that though dinosaurs had high bone structure, in bone structure there were present growing ring that oppose the endotherms behaviours. She claims that dinosaurs grow rapidly then slowly and finally grownig stop at constant growing rate. Additionaly, then again growing rapidly and that is case for dense haversian canals and is nothing to do with edotherms thery.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e endotherms and author provides reasons threef support. However, the professor e...
^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'endotherms'' or 'endotherm's'?
Suggestion: endotherms'; endotherm's
...were found in polar region taht support endotherms theory. The professor opposes this poin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... position is advantages for running and this phenomena is very much common for dinos...
^^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... also adheres to endotherms behaviours. the professor opposes this point by said th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, then, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51528384279 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47187030954 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528384279476 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3217917952 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1538461538 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463057743454 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181084168593 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201840937237 0.0662205650399 305% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340587856863 0.162205337803 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.307368393812 0.0443174109184 694% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.