Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
While some believe that networking during school years is more important than studying hard for future success, I disagree with this. In fact, there should be a balance between both interacting with people as well as academic aspects For success in a future job. This balance will be further elaborated in the ensuing passage.
Firstly, Studying hard and Doing well in academia helps to be more well informed than other students. Consequently, it will show in the overall GPA of a hard-working student. Consequently, a high GPA will give the graduated student an extra advantage when it comes to job hunting. Not to mention that this extra advantage will be much more with having good relations from school. For example, when I was hunting for jobs, the one who interviewed me was a former student whom I met at school. the interviewer was impressed by my grades. However, there was another applicant who fits the job as well. But, he employed me immediately when he remembered me. obviously, balancing both hard work and networking is a key to future success.
Secondly, studying hard during school years is the major opportunity to go into depth and have a better understanding of the subjects. Thus, widens the horizons which eventually adds to future success in work. For instance, Employers respect and admire employees who are well informed and competitive. Eventually, these employees get promoted faster than their colleagues. However, we can't deny the importance of relations in getting promoted as well. Good relation with your employer contributes to success in future jobs as well. That's why both networking and good academic knowledge are needed for success.
to sum it up, To achieve success in the future means to be unique. To be balanced with this uniqueness. Reaching success is conveyed by both hard work and good relations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ce between both interacting with people as well as academic aspects For success in a futur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... a former student whom I met at school. the interviewer was impressed by my grades....
^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ster than their colleagues. However, we cant deny the importance of relations in get...
^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...utes to success in future jobs as well. Thats why both networking and good academic k...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...mic knowledge are needed for success. to sum it up, To achieve success in the fu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05573770492 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77731045667 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554098360656 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5832933927 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.0909090909 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8636363636 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95454545455 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 4.33554083885 392% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323058039253 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934469653978 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855796824628 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208977510831 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719834109816 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.