Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Today there are lots of press and mass media which one of their central goals is broadcasting the local or even international news. Every day we are bombarding by different news stream and it is crucial to receive correct and precise information. In this respect, some people hold the view that in order to be well-informed, you should get information from different news resources. I strongly agree with this statement due to some reasons. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through three outstanding reasons.
The most significant reason that supports my idea regarding the aforementioned issue is that most of the news resources, especially political news, are managed by specific political parties and their commentator's viewpoint toward some news is somewhat biased and they take the side of their own party. For example, two years ago, during covering the news about a suicide attack in Paris, some news resources attributed it to their rival party but it was totally groundless. This misleading information forms an incorrect mindset in the audience. The best way in order to avoid this happening is by getting information from different news resources and then compare it with the interpretations of neutral authentic resources.
One should also consider the fact that the news world also has a competitive atmosphere in which some resources are greedy about attracting more audiences as it has financial benefits for them. In this respect, yellow presses are a good example. these resources cover the news in an unprofessional and unethical way. For example, they use eye-catching headlines mostly about financial or ethical scandals of politicians in order to increase their sales. These resources mostly exaggerate the news and do not have any authentic sources. Again the best way for identifying these resources and avoiding their trap is getting information from different news resources. By getting information from different resources people gradually would distinguish between authentic and inauthentic resources and would be well-informed.
The last but not the least point to be mentioned is that different news sources have a different perspective. For example, some of them interpret the news and events in detail but another resource considers events as a whole. Some of the commentators consider only the political aspects behind each news. However, some others take into account the scientific or even psychological aspects besides political aspects. Also, each news resource covers a specific field for example politic, sciences, sports and etc. using different news resources not only help people to interpret news from different perspectives but also it provides a good opportunity for them to enhance their knowledge in different areas and broaden their horizon.
In conclusion, since the news station are not always impartial and have political biases, and sometimes deliberately exaggerate the news it is more beneficial for people to get the information from different resources. This also helps them to enhance their knowledge and give them a better perspective. In this regard, governments have a pivotal role in order to make these news resources accessible to all people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ect, yellow presses are a good example. these resources cover the news in an unprofes...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...r resource considers events as a whole. Some of the commentators consider only the politica...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 505, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...d for example politic, sciences, sports and etc. using different news resources not only...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
...mple politic, sciences, sports and etc. using different news resources not only help ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, regarding, so, then, well, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 7.30242825607 329% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 30.3222958057 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2736.0 1373.03311258 199% => OK
No of words: 506.0 270.72406181 187% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40711462451 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.04702891845 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96808469982 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 145.348785872 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482213438735 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 854.1 419.366225166 204% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 13.0662251656 191% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7754273026 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.44 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.24 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268406941135 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832392038599 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795554311753 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172640341372 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472533889189 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 63.6247240618 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.